Essay on Fighting for Equality and Freedom - 1229 Words

America is a nation built on the beliefs and ideals that man is free. In WWII, challenges arose in America’s freedom. The Declaration of Independence stated that â€Å"†¦all men are created equal.† However, the rights for the ‘White Man’ were significantly above all others, and because of this, women and black men lacked the same equality as the ‘White Man’. In WWII, women took up jobs previously held by men, while the African Americans attempted to join the military. They wanted to assist in the war effort and help defend America to gain their freedom. This freedom for America meant to protect home soil from foreign threats. Through equality and freedom, America can become what the founding fathers sought it out to be, a land free of†¦show more content†¦Seen in a letter written by Major Louise R. Camden in 1944 talking about the captain of the ship was the quote â€Å"he was rather concerned about it†. This quote is commenting on how worried the captain was about carrying women aboard his ship. Carrying women aboard a ship was not a normal occurrence therefore it created havoc and caused quite a stir. Not only was there commotion about women on board but this shows that a great deal of prejudice was now on the field of gender inequality. The gender and race discrimination was on not only the foreign front but also the same wars existed at home. As Henry Wallace said in his speech The Century of a Common Man, there was a fight between a slave world and a free world. In this address, Wallace called for a creation of a permanent Nation. There was a want to rendezvous with destiny. Wallace believed that there was an obligation to contribute to the settlement and create civil rights as we fought for freedom. Wallace was speaking for the majority of Americans by pursuing freedom and for equality. Fighting for freedom, Wallace was not alone. In a letter to his son, First Lieutenant Wal lace Zosel said, â€Å"Millions of us are over here are working, and fighting, and dying because we want America to be a nation of hope for mankind†. This shows that along with Wallace, many other Americans think the same way and want the same thing. This same thing being equality and a freeShow MoreRelated Fighting for Equality and Freedom Essays910 Words   |  4 PagesAcross all nations and cultures, the enduring pursuit of equality in life seems global and timeless. Some would believe that their own country has achieved a true democracy with no residual inequalities of which to speak, while others know they are at the other end of the spectrum, enduring unjust laws that should not be bestowed on any human. Through the course of history many countries have fought for that democracy and all the equality that it implies. While some believe they have reached thatRead MoreAmerica: Racist Tyrant Essay976 Words   |  4 PagesJean-Jacques Rousseau concludes that the soci al contract benefits those who are not strong to receive equality in law and civil rights. Jefferson fought for freedom and right for America. King also fought for better civil rights for his black people. They both fought for their people, King however fought peacefully with white people, who in return were cruel. This comparing Jeffersons and Kings fought for freedom, different skin color demonstrates racism causing unfairness to this day still exists becauseRead More America the Racist Tyrant1015 Words   |  5 Pageswrites to a clergyman logically analyzing criticisms while communicating to the public his arguments. Jefferson fought for freedom and right for America. King also fought for better civil rights for his black people. They both fought for their people, King however fought peacefully with white people, who in return were cruel. This comparing Jeffersons and Kings fought for freedom, different skin color demonstrates racism causing unfairness to this day still exists because the fight for justice andRead MoreAmerican Identity1566 Words   |  7 PagesThe five key values that were studied and learned about in class were civic engagement, freedom, equality, patriotism and democracy. I do not believe that one of these values is more American than the other though three of these mean more to me personally than others. Patriotism, freedom, and equality. Together they make the United States of America unique from any other country. Yes, some countries have freedom, but no other country in the world is like ours because we hold these values nearest andRead MoreAmerican Beliefs and Values719 Words   |  3 Pagesincluded the famous Revolutionary war where the British colonies broke away from England and became independent and free. The American’s beliefs and values developed during this time and became important to why they were fighting for their freedom. Religion, freedom and liberty, and equality was only three of the many values the Americ ans had. Religion was important to the Americans during the Revolutionary period. George Washington states in his Rules of Civility, â€Å"When you speak of God or his attributesRead MoreNegritude Positive?1108 Words   |  5 Pagessearching for racial identity, when we could use that time to fight for equality between the races? You tell us, when we find our racial identity what then must we do with it? Continue to be restricted from doing certain things and going certain places because of our racial line? I agree with Du Bois’s argument, that racial identification is a hindrance and that it distracts us from the more important goal of fighting for equality between the races. It limits us from many things such as; education andRead MoreBattle Royal1553 Words   |  7 PagesA Battle Royal for Equality: An Analysis of Ralph Ellison’s â€Å"Battle Royal† â€Å"Battle Royal† provides a realistic portrait of the difficulty of being a black person in a Country dominated by white men. Ellison uses several symbols in â€Å"Battle Royal† to illustrate the black struggle for equality. These symbols include the stripper, the flag tattoo on the stripper’s stomach, the blindfold, and the battle itself. The stripper is symbolic of the connection between women and black people in the eyesRead Moreâ€Å"I Am Happy To Join With You Today In What Will Go Down1420 Words   |  6 Pagesdemonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.† (Lerone Bennett Jr. pg.125) Being a hero means to be a leader. To be a leader you have to have strength, courage, and commitment. In the 1960s, there were many leaders fighting for what they believe is the right of freedom and equality of all people. A major leader, Martin Luther King Jr. was involved in the Civil Rights Movement during the 60s. King was influenced by advocates of nonviolence such as Mahatma Gandhi. He wanted to seek equality for AfricanRead MoreWhy The Colonists Bec ome American After The Revolution?1348 Words   |  6 Pagesthat makes up an American was established i.e. freedom, equality, opportunity and such. In order to better understand this we must look at exactly what an American is. So exactly what makes someone an American? When it comes to being American I think there are three main essential characteristics. The first I would say is freedom. To be an American you have to want to be free and believe in freedom. The second would have to be believing in equality for all. Lastly would be living in the United StatesRead MoreAnalysis Of Langston Hughes s Poem, I, Too1193 Words   |  5 Pagespeople ponder about America, they associate it with a place where citizens have tons of freedom and equality. But sometimes, Americans do not get these freedoms and equality right off the bat as other people in other countries expect. Being an American can come with a lot of perks, such as the freedom to speak your thoughts, freedom to express yourself and several more; However, to obtain these perks, freedoms, and rights, the people must be able to fight and defend their rights. Therefore, along

The Basic Three Functions Of Communication - 1566 Words

OB Final Exam 1. Communications fulfils three main functions within an organization, name them and explain their impact from an effective and ineffective perspective. The basic three functions of communication in organization are to inform, persuade, and motivate. Inform The idea of informing within an organization is to provide data and information so that employees can effectively complete their job. There are three ways through which information can travel: Downward moving information: In this type, information moves from superiors to subordinates and usually consists of directives or updates. For example, Executives of a company introduce a new code of conduct to its managers and employees. Upward moving information: Information†¦show more content†¦It also eliminates job uncertainty among workers when they are fully informed. Ineffective: It creates gap between different process and departments in organization, decreases efficiency of employees and increase redundancy since there is no proper understanding of role and responsibilities. It also increases job uncertainty among workers when they are not informed about the future and vision of the company. Persuasion Another essential function of communication would be the element of persuasion. It is the ability to change the attitude or behaviour of employees, vendors, clients, etc. In general, persuasion is used in an organizational environment effectively when the source of the information is trustworthy. Effective: Effective communication leads to Effective persuasion in an organization. It creates anenvironment where employees trust upper-level executives’ decisions. For example, if a company decides to merge with another company, employees will have confidence that merger will not affect them negatively. Confidence on thetop management creates loyal employees, who work more effectively towards achieving company’s goals Ineffective: Past experience of ineffective communication leads to lack of trust. For example, supposedly theemployees had a past experience of company hiding its bad financial condition leading to layoffs Employees will now be more insecure of their jobs leading to

Religious attacks Essay Example For Students

Religious attacks Essay The Religious Attacks Made By TartuffeMoliere (whose real name was Jean-Baptiste Poquelin) rocked the 17th century French world withhis comedy Tartuffe in 1664. Although, religious factions kept the play banned from theatres from1664-1669, Tartuffe emerged from the controversy as one of the all-time great comedies. Tartuffe is a convincing religious hypocrite. He is a parasite who is sucking Orgon, the richtrusting father, for all he is worth. Orgon does not realize that Tartuffe is a phony, and caters to hisevery whim. For instance, he reneges on his promise to let his daughter Mariane, marry Valere. Insteadhe demands that she wed Tartuffe, whom she despises. He also banishes his own son, Damis, from hishouse for speaking out against Tartuffe and all of his sons inheritance is promised to Tartuffe. Tartuffe is nothing more than a traveling confidence man who veils his true wickedness with amask of piety. Orgon and his mother Madame Pernelle are completely taken in by this charade. O n theother hand, Cleante, Elmire, and Dorine see Tartuffe for the fake that he really is. Cleante is Orgonselegantly about Tartuffes hypocrisy. Through Cleante, Moliere most plainly reveals his theme. Spare me your warnings, Brother; I have no fearOf speaking out, for you and Heaven to hear,Against affected zeal and pious knavery. Theres true and false in piety, as in bravery,And just as those whose courage shines the mostIn battle, are least inclined to boast,So those whose hearts are truly pure and lowlyDont make a flashy show of being holy (Meyer 1466). In speeches such as these, Moliere wanted to get across the fact that it was false piety he wascondemning and not religion in general. In the preface to the play, which Moliere himself wrote, hebluntly states this. If one takes the trouble to examine my comedy in good faith, he will surely seethat my intentions are innocent throughout, and tend in no way to make fun of what men revere; that Ihave presented the subject with all the precautions that its delicacy imposes; and that I have used allthe art and skill that I could to distinguish clearly the character of the hypocrite from that of theThe play successfully conveys this message because Tartuffe is a first-class villain. He is asmanipulative as Lady Macbeth, as greedy as Prince John, as underhanded as Modred, and as clever as DarthVader. Through his every word and deed it becomes more apparent that he is thoroughly bad. Morespecifically, he not only wants to marry Orgons daughter, but wants to defile his wife as well. He isnot satisfied with living off of Orgons wealth but wants to possess it. At no time in the play doesTartuffe resemble a truly pious man. The play never mocks God, but only those who use his name to preyThe part of the fool is played to the hilt by Orgon. Throughout the first three acts he is sucha domineering idiot that he is not even worth pitying. He, along with his mother, play the part of theblind zealot. What he chooses to call Christian love leads him to punish his family and himself becausehe takes away their freedom of choice and integrity and his own property. But, Orgon is not content tofollow Tartuffe alone. He demands that his family also follow. He becomes a threat to their happinesswhen the comedic scheming by the family begins. Dorine, Marianes maid, uses her earthy wit to convince Mariane and Valere not to docilelyaccept Orgons judgement. Damis, Orgons son, testifies against Tartuffes scandalous behavior withElmire. Cleante continues to offer Orgon sage advice and Elmire conspires to set a trap for Tartuffewhere Orgon can witness firsthand the ungrateful hypocrites actions. Dorine and Orgon almost come to blows, Damis is banished, and Cleante is ignored. Only Elmiresucceeds. She hides Orgon under a table while pretending to play along with Tartuffes advances. Evenwhen Orgon witnesses Tartuffes treachery firsthand it takes him a while to accept it. Elmire, by thistime, has so little faith in her husband that she begins to think he is going to stay under the table andlet Tartuffe ravish her. The turning point in the play is when Orgon comes out and confronts Tartuffe. The Metamorphosis: Gregor Was An Unselfish Person EssayIt is obvious that the play Tartuffe contains a meaning much deeper than an amusing littleanecdote. Trying to decide which of these methods is more effective is possible only by using thefollowing basic criteria. Which viewpoint captures the essence of the religious theme Moliere was tryingWhen reading the casual reader will see that Moliere is attacking religious hypocrites. Whilethe play will be amusing, and possibly will convey its point, the reader cannot possibly understand thefull weight the play carries without knowing the historical background behind it. For instance whenCleante declares, So there is nothing that I find more base, Than specious pietys dishonest face,Than these bold mountebanks, these histories, Whose impious mummeries and hollow shows (Meyer 1467). Throughout the play, one will observe the parallels between the villain, Tartuffe, and religious leadersof Molieres day, specifically Cardinal Richelieu. It is obvious that Moliere detested the way that menlike this rose to power. Cleante speaks out, saying, (these men) exploit our love of Heaven, and make ajest, Of all that men think holiest and best; These calculating souls who offer prayers, Not to theirMaker, but as public wares (Meyer 1467). He is condemning false religion, religion which is used onlyto gain political power. During Molieres lifetime he had seen Richelieu rise through the politicalranks, using religion as a springboard, until he was the kings chief minister. This is the falsepiety Cleante condemns in the play. By looking at Tartuffe historically it becomes clear the courage it took for Moliere toperform this play, knowing that he would be ostracized by the church for the rest of his life. AtMolieres death, Bishop Bossuet said, God is showing his anger against Moliere (Bishop X). However,by using the historical viewpoint, we can see that Moliere actually died a hero, knowing that he hadBibliography:Works CitedBishop, Morris. Eight Plays By Moliere. New York:The Modern Library, 1957. Fernandez, Ramon. Moliere: The Man Seen Through the Plays. New York:Hill and Wang, 1958. Gassner, John. Comedies of Moliere. New York:The Book League of America, 1946. Meyer, Michael. The Bedford Introduction to Literature. Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martins Press, 1989. Walker, Hallam. Moliere. Boston:Twayne Publishers, 1990.

The Madness Of Prince Hamlet Essays - Characters In Hamlet

The madness of prince Hamlet In Hamlet, Prince of Denmark the protagonist exhibits a puzzling duplicitous nature. Hamlet contradicts himself throughout out the play. He endorses both of the virtues of acting a role and being true to oneis self. He further supports both of these conflicting endorsements with his actions. This ambiguity is demonstrated by his alleged madness, for he does behave madly, only to become perfectly calm and rational an instant later. These inconsistencies are related with the internal dilemmas he faces. He struggles with the issue of revenging his fatheris death, vowing to kill Claudius and then backing out, several times. Upon this point Hamlet teeters through the play. The reason for this teetering is directly related to his inability to form a solid opinion about role playing. This difficulty is not present, however, at the start of the play. In the first act Hamlet appears to be very straightforward in his actions and inner state. When questioned by Gertrude about his melancholy appearance Hamlet says, Seems, madam? Nay it is. I know not seemsi (1.2.76). This is to say I am what I appear to be. Later he makes a clear statement about his state when he commits himself to revenge. In this statement the play makes an easy to follow shift. This shift consists of Hamlet giving up the role of a student and mourning son. Hamlet says, Iill wipe away all trivial fond records, All saws of books, all forms, all pressures past, That youth and observation copied there, And thy commandment all alone shall live Within the book and volume of my brain (1.5.99-103) Hamlet is declaring that he will be committed to nothing else but the revenge of his fathers death. There is no confusion about Hamletis character. He has said earlier that he is what he appears to be, and there is no reason to doubt it. In the next act, however, Hamletis status and intentions suddenly and with out demonstrated reason becomes mired in confusion. When Hamlet appears again in act two, it seems that he has lost the conviction that was present earlier. He has yet to take up the part assigned to him by the ghost. He spends the act walking around, reading, talking with Polonius, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, and the players. It is not until the very end of the act that he even mentions vengeance. If he had any of the conviction shown earlier he would be presently working on his vengeance. So instead of playing the part of vengeful son, or dropping the issue entirely, he hangs out in the middle, pretending to be mad. This is shown when he says to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern I know not-lost all my mirth, forgone all custom of exercise (2.2.298-299). Later he tells them that he is just feigning madness when he says, I am but mad north-north-west, when the wind is southerly, I know a hawk from a handsaw (2.2.380-381). Admitting so blatantly that he is only feigning madness would imply that he is comfortable with it. He also seems to be generally comfortable with acting This is evidenced when he says, there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so (2.2.251-252). Hamlet is saying that behavior shapes reality. It is puzzling that Hamlet is comfortable with playing at this point but not with the role that he said he would play earlier. If he is to play a role why not the one that his father gave him? When the players come in a short wile later his attitude changes. Hamlet is prompted to vengeance, again, by the moving speech that is given by one of the players. About this speech he says, Whatis Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba, That he should weep for her? What would he do Had he motive and cue for passion That I have? (2.2.561-564) In this praise of this players ability to act, Hamlet is saying that if he were such an actor he would have killed Claudius by now. This link between vengeance and acting that is present here is what Hamlet struggles with until very near the end. He is then moved to swear that he should kill Claudius when